Directed Energy Technology Dr Judy Wood

I hope it never goes away.

Gabriel wrote:

Sky and mic,

Good conversation here on this topic....I bought and read Dr. Judy Wood,s book,I believe every word she said.....she nails this topic, hard and fast, this chick is one smart lady.

Agreed. She is not a conspiracy theorist. Just an excellent researcher.

Now here is the deal.....just watch for those that try to steer people away from this truth. This is a large puzzle, and when we put this information firmly in place, it speaks volumes about other's agendas. AJ comes to mind.

Why was Coast to Coast so reluctant to have Judy on????


http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2011/05/03

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=276&Itemid=60

Judy Wood should be in the Hall of Fame.


She's said that this is a cover-up, but this is what we've all known all along, but it took somebody of reputation to come out and say it.



well done her

i like dr wood. Its hard for anyone to write her off as 'just some batshit crazy tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy nutjob'.

Imo it was - crash some planes for effect/propaganda, crack the internal structure with nano-thermite, bust the foundations with clean micro-nukes, and turn it all to dust with orbital DEWs.

In Judy's book she showed these great pictures of metal material falling from the tower and the 2 pieces of metal falling were changing into dust as they fell.

Both pieces of debri had TRAILS OF DUSTconnected to them??? They looked like a comet looks when going through space as heavy dust trails were trailing away right behind the pieces as they fell.

A picture is worth 1000 words, and Judy had a lot of great pictures in her book that I have never seen.

Steel, or any other material falling does not have a tail connected to it, unless it is being changed molecularly as it is falling.......wow.

stal wrote:

i like dr wood. Its hard for anyone to write her off as 'just some batshit crazy tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy nutjob'.

Imo it was - crash some planes for effect/propaganda, crack the internal structure with nano-thermite, bust the foundations with clean micro-nukes, and turn it all to dust with orbital DEWs.

Almost got it right stal, almost, but not quite.

There were no planes that hit the Towers that day. Planes were only shown on TV to fool the viewers and those that don't ask questions. In actual fact, the only thing that could make a hole in a building is a torpedo, or missile of some kind.

Have a look at this video for bad video fakery. Basically we have a composit where its possible to see where the fake bits are overlaid onto the film but not quite in-line with the original picture. I believe the plane was overlaid in the film to make it look like it had gone into the first Tower and this is what was shown on TV. It's a bit like bad Photo-shopping but on video instead of pictures.




Let's do the logic...

No plane could possibly fly into a wall, let alone steel frames and go out the other side. Their outer shell has to be light in order to get off the ground. All planes have a thin outer shell of aluminum to keep it light. Aluminum crumples like paper when met with any kind of resistance.

The wings would have broken off on impact too, as would the tail fins. If you've ever flown on a plane you'll notice that the wings flex up and down when it's flying. No wings on ANY plane are strong enough to withstand a building impact. The only things able to stand any kind of crash could possibly be the engines. No doubt they would be badly bent, but basically intact. The 'so-called' tyre that was 'planted' a few streets away didn't even fit the plane it supposedly came off.

apologies skywatcher, i should have been clearer.

Use the appearence of passenger jets to foster public support.

Personaly, i think john lear's letter says it all wrt the planes.

look into the insurence claims.

There is a whole lot of cash waiting to be claimed by the families of the supposed pssengers of the planes the crashed. Given that the USA is so fond of free money from lawsuits, one might think that all the sttlements had been settled. Interestingly, they have not been. Only a handfull of families have cashed out.

apologies for spelling mistakes. Is late, am tired...

Ahhh my dear Stal, that's because there were no planes, hence the alleged outstanding claims.

Gotta love Judy for her strong will and determination. She has no hidden agenda ... just the truth.


Ever watched a plane fly over at low altitudes? They do not travel as fast as the ones in the media videos. They cannot physically fly 500 mph at that low altitude..

Watch a plane landing over a freeway....slow motion compared to the 911 clips.



Therefore had to be missiles that were photoshopped. Think about the olympics in China. We all saw fireworks on tv, but in reality they didn't happen because of the smog over the city that night.

micjer wrote:

Gotta love Judy for her strong will and determination. She has no hidden agenda ... just the truth.


Ever watched a plane fly over at low altitudes? They do not travel as fast as the ones in the media videos. They cannot physically fly 500 mph at that low altitude..

Watch a plane landing over a freeway....slow motion compared to the 911 clips.



Therefore had to be missiles that were photoshopped. Think about the olympics in China. We all saw fireworks on tv, but in reality they didn't happen because of the smog over the city that night.

Cool videos mic

[youtube][/youtube]

Now remember, the "smoke" is coming off of concrete and steel. Two things that don't burn on a fall morning on Earth.

And the spire... Steel doesn't evaporate, or dustify.

Stinks more than rotten fish huh?

One of the biggest travesties of justice at the beginning of a new millenium and still no one brought to justice.

No justice at all Biggs.....it is a sad state of affairs.

Yeah, micjer, that's the money shot right there. You can clearly see the entire central support structure vaporize. The elevator shafts, electrical housing, steel beams one foot by three feet.... That should have stood! There should have been a gothic-like spire standing there.

The platforms for the DEW were hidden in the smoke. If it is still out there, a movie titled "The Birds: UAVs on 9/11" or something to that effect. Flying unmanned vehicles carrying lazar targeting systems, capable of supersonic speeds. The old series of vids on YT were 9 In number, number 8 featured a video shot from a location just past the Catacombs. A "bird" can be seen flying through the smoke (winds blowing out of the North, so just to the south of WTC) and 5 seconds later you can hear it fly over the cameras location. Via Google Earth, the distance of the camera was somewhere around a mile+ away!! Hmmmmm.... @ 60mph, it takes 60 seconds to go one mile....

I was just working in my basement, rockin' out to some Tool, and heard the line "Rob the grave to snow the cradle, then burn the evidence down", a clear reference, in my opinion to WTC 7. All of the office and gov't offices, banks, etc housed in that building. After five or six hours, I'm sure they got out everything they wanted, then destroyed what they didn't want to survive, then claimed it all on the insurance claim.... Double-dip!!

Just remember.... Karma's a bitch!

Other high rise buildings that catch on fire by natural means (i.e. arson or carelessness, not planes) burn for days and the metal structure still stands after all that time, let alone after a few hours. The metal does not vapourise or dustify either.

Funny huh.