Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information

There were NO planes involved on 9.11.01 period.

You were shown planes crashing into the Towers on TV, but that was BS. Missiles brought down the Towers. Therefore, there were NO people on the planes Gabe. Even the flight numbers are made up, they didn't exist either!!

The names are fictional, they never existed, so they never got on the planes. The flight list was a construct, made up, fabricated.

It's ALL lies from start to finish.

9/11 is a hard one for lots of people to get their heads around for sure.

skywatcher wrote:

There were NO planes involved on 9.11.01 period.

You were shown planes crashing into the Towers on TV, but that was BS. Missiles brought down the Towers. Therefore, there were NO people on the planes Gabe. Even the flight numbers are made up, they didn't exist either!!

The names are fictional, they never existed, so they never got on the planes. The flight list was a construct, made up, fabricated.

It's ALL lies from start to finish.

9/11 is a hard one for lots of people to get their heads around for sure.

I am not convinced that the planes hit the wtc's, but there were real people involved. For example...

Garnet Bailey

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garnet_Bailey

Quote :

Garnet Edward "Ace" Bailey (June 13, 1948 – September 11, 2001) was a Canadian professional ice hockey player and scout who was a member of Stanley Cup and Memorial Cup winning teams. He died at age 53 when United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into the World Trade Center in New York City during the September 11 attacks.

How they died or where they ended up is the question for me.

Yes there are a lot of people unaccounted for. We may never know all the details about this, but we do all know that it was a false flag operation pulled off by Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and others in that perverted administration we had.

This is an awesome thread.

2 fields of thought...




then this....

As the number of strange anomalies and coincidences on the morning of 9/11 pile on top of each other, a reasonable investigator would at some point start to use the sheer force of so many convenient improbabilities against the official narrative. Add to that pile of suspicion the unusually low number of passengers aboard each of the hijacked flights that morning. Flight 11 and Flight 175, both Boeing 767s with approximately 180 available seats, had 76 and 46 passengers respectively. Flight 77 and Flight 93, both Boeing 757s with approximately 200 available seats, had 50 and 26 passengers respectively.

What this 30% passenger occupancy essentially means is that on each of the flights that were hijacked that morning, every passenger on every plane had an entire row to themselves to lie down. Any savvy, experienced traveler knows that when flying a major airliner, on a non-stop cross-country trip, at a commuter friendly morning flight time from one major U.S. city to another, it is incredibly good luck to get a row of surrounding open seats. On the morning of 9/11, every passenger on every plane had, essentially, an open row to themselves. And on Flight 93 that went down in Shanksville, PA, there were 10 more rows than passengers.

9/11 investigators have attempted to compare these numbers to the passenger lists from the same previous Tuesday morning flights the week before, on 9/4/01. But the FBI continues to refuse, without any explanation, to produce that information. It is known, however, that major airliners in the U.S. regularly shift their passengers to other flights and airlines serving the same cities if numbers are too low to justify the flight. But on the morning of 9/11, this protocol, like so many others that day, was not followed.

Furthermore, on the morning of 9/11 on officially released passenger lists provided by the airlines to the media, not one of the alleged hijacker's names appears.

In fact, no Arab names appear on any of the four passenger lists. "It has been claimed that the names of the hijackers were on the airlines' flight manifests. However, there is no public evidence of this. Researchers who have attempted to obtain this information from the airlines have been rebuffed." Add this information to the stories that have been told of last minute gate changes, passenger swaps, bizarre cell phone calls, planes disappearing and reappearing on radar screens, impossibly flown aircraft maneuvers, and you would have at least a part of a story worth investigating. But the oddly low numbers of passengers on the planes that morning, and the complete absence of any of the alleged hijackers' names on the original flight passenger lists, is left as irrelevant. Why? What could possibly be more relevant than the fact that the main suspects of the crimes in question appear not to have even been present at the scene of those crimes?

Source:-
http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_17.htm

I got ya. No passengers on planes that hit the WTC. I agree. There were people involved just not sure where they went.

This is a fascinating read, Not done yet but is awesome research so far.

http://letsrollforums.com/happened-passengers-4-flights-t20496.html?s=d50e0f6e7a62ca095a72f5781730e027&

When you think of all this, can you imagine just how much pre-planning that went into it by the people that masterminded it, and we know that was inside the country.

WTC buildings had to have security cameras for the mere fact that there was a previous attack on it, so thats a given.

I wonder where most of the grunt people are that did that work, six feet under perhaps. its atypical to the point of cliche.