I thought this was too funny...

I follow healthcare topics and found this answer from the M.D. really laughable.
Hopefully more people will wake up and do their own research on all the lies we've been fed.


Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 2:13 PM
To: healthfraud@lists.quackwatch.org
Subject: [healthfraud] Rusell Blaylock

Russell Blaylock and his Blaylock Wellness Report are both flagged on
Quackwatch - Blaylock for promoting questionable methods and the Report for
being fundamentally flawed.
And he appears to have been embraced by
certain libertarian-conservative-new age folks who are skeptical or
dismissive of "establishment medicine" and/or the FDA.

But can anyone explain why his methods are questionable and his Report
fundamentally flawed?

Thanks,
Madison Searle
-----------------------------------

From: Harriet Hall <harriet.hall@comcast.net>
To: Healthfraud <healthfraud@lists.quackwatch.com>
Sent: Sun, Jul 26, 2009 2:32 pm
Subject: Re: [healthfraud] Rusell Blaylock

You said you know that he "opposes a number of widely
accepted findings among scientists on asparatame, flouride, vaccines,
mercury amalgams and much else."

In other words, he rejects good science.

Isn't that enough to discredit him? What more are you looking for?

His methods are questionable because he opposes findings that are based on
good evidence and recommends treatments that are based on poor quality
evidence, guesswork, or that go beyond the evidence or that sometimes have
actually been proven not to work.

There are statements on his website that
are clearly false, for instance he repeats many of the lies of the
anti-vaxers and THINCS (The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics).

A brief glance at his website was enough to convince me he is not a reliable
source of health information.

Harriet Hall, MD
The SkepDoc
www.skepdoc.info
www.sciencebasedmedicine.org


_______________________________________________