diamond in the sky

i came across this the other day and thought it interesting..
the second link is a bit long so i am just posting the link




Comet 67P/Churyumov- Gerasimenko

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/ESAGJF7708D_0.html

http://www.enterprisemission.com/Rosetta/Rosetta-analysis-test.htm

The last time they landed an impactor on a comet it caused a huge explosion that they never did explain... (Deep Impact - Comet Temple 1)

That is because they don't have to explain anything if they don't want to. Sheesh.

You should know that. You have been spending too much time cruising the Vegas shows LOL, but not that funny really. You do not have to spell it out why or why they do not explain anything for God's sake.

Biggles wrote:

That is because they don't have to explain anything if they don't want to. Sheesh.

No it's because they didn't know what happened... caught them off guard...

Maybe that wasn't a comet after all but one of those light ships that the Heaven's Gate people claimed they were catching a ride on... (that too looked like a comet) Considering the size of the secondary explosion that could be seen for DAYS from Earth it is most likely that it was not a simple comet they 'shot' at...

This may not interest anyone here, but it interests me a lot. I can see I am wasting my time here.

Comet 17P/Holmes on 16th of November it had a mysterious explosion that expanded it to three times the size of Jupiter, then finally bigger than the sun before it left our system...






This is the explosion on Temple 1, an object that was supposed to be a chunk of dirty ice... Ice does not explode in a brilliant flash from merely hitting it with an impactor with no explosives




18 February 2003 Comet NEAT... This one also got 3 times as big as Jupiter... This is the one Nassim Haramein claims IS Nibiru and passed us in 2003...



But your right, I don't need to explain anything :distruckter:

ahhhhhhhh nogroz


This may not interest anyone here, but it interests me a lot. I can see I am wasting my time here.

I don't think you are wasting your time here..and before i read your words i was looking at the rock thing and thought it had a window like thing on it..yikes....it's the comet neat pic...maybe the damn thing was a star ship

different views are always important to the learning/teaching experinces we are all having...but sometimes we get caught up in our own little path and expeiments and get touchy about other folks saying hey look over here..

so sorry if your feelings were hurt by anything i have said...i was only funnin cause i thought you could handle it..
talking tough was how my father used to communicate so i fall into it naturally and sometimes don't look closely enough
to see if the other person is in that space or ....sigh.. in a different space..

personally i enjoy your sharing and the push/pull of words liftin my glass to your continuing

hugs
D

So what if NASA is targeting these 'rocks' that may not be rocks?

Speaking of windows on rocks, have a look at this ESA image of Asteroid Eros...



Interesting huh?

Maybe thats why we don't see the ships... they are disguised as asteriods...

Here is a closer look...



Closer still...




But even on ATS this got barely a flicker of interest...

ya know what blows me away with all this
is that the general public thinks a bunch of crazies
are doctoring the pics

One thing for sure whatever that is in that pic it sure isn't natural.

Alex Collier says the moon was brought here to serve as a giant spaceship. He says it has been mined out to make a living area inside. What a great disguise.

We need the moon. It makes the tides and regulates the internal clocks.

I think the moon was place here for a reason, but not by anything "unnatural"

Also the moon can provide us with free-energy (indirectly)

A..