What's your take on the new Foxnation.com?

http://www.thefoxnation.com/





http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=1229

David Wilcocks' latest blog suggests that Obama is a "white hat" and the different factions of the Illuminati are fighting and are trying to discredit Obama by using mainstream media to stir the pot so to speak.

http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=462&Itemid=70

That has to be the biggest hypocritical marketing campaign in history.

David Wilcock's take on the 5 different factions of ruling elite is an interesting perspective.

i have to say i was shocked to hear about one guy saying he was the antichrist


i keep switching back and forth to what i think of him..which in itself makes me crazy
cause i normally make up my mind and then adjust what i hear to fit that

interesting times we are living in

************************************************

ok.. i went and tried to read david's stuff..but how he can type after so continuously patting himself on the back is beyond me...
and oh he has suffered so..makes ya want to barf on the spot..

even though i like most of his stuff..sigh...it's positive

and i want to like/trust obama and i want to believe things will change..
and then yikes..
they are..
he just got the ceo of GM fired...hummmmmmmmmmm
why not the ceo's of all the money grubbers on wall street..

ok.. what's it called when the gov runs all the business
what's it called when the gov puts all your helath info on line and takes dna samples
whenever you are in the hospital..
and what's it called when one man who is soo carismatic can get his own way

it's called
DAMN SCARY.......
with whispers of hitler

and then my brain says..well what he is doing is up front and visible
way better than the last one who took as many freedoms as he could secretly
and then
oh man my brain says
with what the last one did this one has even more power to DICTATE what he wants

so yeah..the jury of my opinion is still out on this one
well maybe it's a hung jury ..sigh

it certainly is an interesting article, but i find problems with some of his points.


fox nation/fox news is trashing obama simply because theyve changed tactics. while bush was in office, everything was fine and the bailouts were justified. there was also never any mention about the mexican border problems (even though lou dobbs reported on this practically every day).

basically, fox switched tactics and continues to play the partisan game. theyre very good at that. fox news sensed the change in the political winds and has become pseudo-libertarian to jump on the alex jones/ron paul bandwagon. now, fox news tells us that theyre "looking out for us". theyre fighting against obamas socialism, but its the same story of good cop/bad cop. they are simply throwing a few more slices of truth into their lie sandwiches.

obama couldve easily been brought down before the election with the larry sinclair scandal, the birth certificate deal, and, in the political arena, his lack of experience. the NWO faction never said a WORD about any of these things until AFTER the election was over, even though wilcock claims they 'fought 'savagely' to win the election with mccain/palin. doesnt make sense. why wait until AFTER the election to mention any of this in the mainstream media? before any of these obama "conspiracy issues" were discussed on fox news (run by the NWO faction again, as wilcock claims), the NWO faction ignored them or slammed them as right wing nutjob talk. now theyre legit issues.


alex jones is having problems with this prothink group. i saw the article on rense the other day-- this prothink group is anti-jew/anti-israel and accuses alex of being a zionist supporter or a jewish supporter. reading the prothink website, its clearly obvious to me that prothink is a false flag/ agent provocateur conspiracy group. at the very least, that group(if they ARE legit) is making a mountain out of a molehill with the jewish/zionist garbage. can they be ANY more nearsighted when it comes to the bigger picture??
jones has done far more good than any possible harm by awakening people on the most primary level. (its just my hope that they move on from jones into deeper realms-- i think most do.) besides, jones ignoring religions makes him more mainstream and accessible to those who need to awaken but dont need to get turned off right away by having their religion attacked. religion is mixed in with some positive, well-meaning information so its not of primary importance to change this immediately. later on, yes, theyll need to wake up to organized religion.
jones` attack last october(?) on peter joseph of zeitgeist fame was in bad taste. jones lost some respect and a few listeners with that interview when he wholly dismissed zeitgeist addendum as "communist".


rense.com is getting so anti-semetic that i find that site almost unbearable. zionists and jews on his site are constantly substituted for one another. its similar to substituting the term 'muslim' for 'fundamentalist jihadist' in news articles. ive written to rense about this twice and nothing seems to change.
wilcock is right: the articles are more sarcastic and negative than ever.


all of this, though, makes us constantly question our present beliefs and views and new information often causes us to reevaluate everything we had figured out... which is a good thing. the fact that we are on this site means that we have transcended the bulk of the political quagmire. focusing on spiritual aspects are of far greater importance than determining whether obama is a good guy or a bad guy.

as far as i am concerned, all of the political rhetoric and illuminati control (minor details, really, in the whole of things) leads straight to the 2012 mass consciousness/awakening issue. our time and energy should be focused on that.

I was looking through foxnation today and something jumped out at me. Most if not all of the articles are things that would anger or place fear into the average unawakened individual.

This is one example. You have american autoworkers being told they may not have a job and then you put this in their face that Obama's crew drive foreign cars....might piss them off a bit.




Who's driving what?
By AMIE PARNES & CAROL E. LEE

With President Barack Obama showing the ailing U.S. auto industry some tough love Monday, POLITICO wondered -- what's ...

... in the driveways of White House aides? A lot of foreign cars, as it turns out.

A survey of West Executive Drive, where White House staffers park, revealed only five American cars out of 23 --a Dodge Grand Caravan, two Ford Escapes, a Jeep Cherokee and a Cadillac.


To me their purpose is poke and prod the american people to rise up and protest. Perhaps to the point of rioting and who knows how much further. Its seems like in your face journalism.

With Alex Jones / David Icke there purpose is to awaken us. But this website seems to take the same information with a different purpose. Stir the pot ... wake the lions up.. get them fighting amongst themselves.