All Australians could be implanted with microchips

All Australians could be implanted with microchips for tracking and identification within the next two or three generations, a prominent academic says.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/technology/735519/humans-will-be-implanted-with-microchips

Michael G Michael from the University of Wollongong's School of Information Systems and Technology, has coined the term "uberveillance" to describe the emerging trend of all-encompassing surveillance.

"Uberveillance is not on the outside looking down, but on the inside looking out through a microchip that is embedded in our bodies," Dr Michael told ninemsn.

Microchips are commonly implanted into animals to reveal identification details when scanned and similar devices have been used with Alzheimers patients.

US company VeriChip is already using implantable microchips, which store a 16-digit unique identification number, on humans for medical purposes.

"Our focus is on high-risk patients, and our product's ability to identify them and their medical records in an emergency," spokesperson Allison Tomek said.

"We do not know when or if someone will develop an implantable microchip with GPS technology, but it is not an application we are pursuing."

Another form of uberveillance is the use of bracelets worn by dangerous prisoners which use global positioning systems to pinpoint their movements.

But Dr Michael said the technology behind uberveillance would eventually lead to a black box small enough to fit on a tiny microchip and implanted in our bodies.

I`ll be passing on this option for sure

Quote :

All Australians could be implanted with microchips for tracking and identification within the next two or three generations, a prominent academic says.

If all Australians end up in such a sad state that they all have implants and chips in them. Obviously they decided to create that reality because they did have a choice. It's their choice to live like that. It's not my choice so I will never have one. I actually highly doubt this prominent academic is one when it comes to these things. As he actually has no idea what will happen in the future even if he did go to college. He isn't smart enough to calculate the probability because he hasn't taken those things into account which his brainwashing controllers will not accept from him, or from his system of education in which he attended.

And they want you to think it's inevitable. So Diverdown how does it feel to be doing their job for them?

Australia is not like that there is no protests like this going on where they are holding these signs that is entirely contrived.

Dean,

> So Diverdown how does it feel to be doing their job for them?

This makes me cringe. Why do you have to keep doing that to people here?

Allow me to be critical of you for a moment. Once again, your indirect implication laden criticism of a well meaning contributor to the forum steps over the line (IMHO). This is in the context of another post you made today in a similar - almost passive aggressive vein. It's worse with you because your MO seems to be to target a person/meme combination and then you campaign against them over a series of bone crunching and draining posts. Surely there has to be a better way?

I invite retaliation in kind - ease my burden and balance things up for me please :)

A..

Thank you for noticing Dean's behavior lately Anchor. It is uncalled for.

Linda saying my behavior is uncalled for, is uncalled for. Because what did I do that was wrong? I didn't say Diverdown was a bad person. But if a friend starts supporting controllers techniques I will let them know for sure. This is all part of the structure of everything it doesn't mean I don't understand.


Anchor
Someone who is well meaning does not mind dealing with anything that is interpreted as criticism. Any criticism by me is intended to be constructive and balanced.
My main ambition I don't think you understand. If you do understand you are simply resisting it. I'm not campaigning anything. What am I campaigning for? I deny that I am having a campaign against people. If my posts are so bone crunching and draining as you say they must have some power behind them. If this bone crunching draining power that you see is present you must think it's an attack and that it is dangerous. In that case I would be your enemy and you would then have something to fear. But why would you fear me or see me in this light?

If there is a better way you live it as an example and we will see who we want to follow. You say what is best to ease your burden. You should not blame me that you have a burden as it is your responsibility to balance yourself I cannot do that for you.

If my words become a burden then poor you, you suffer. But I continue how I am because it's how I live and how I live is in light.

Dean Plejaren wrote:

If my posts are so bone crunching and draining as you say they must have some power behind them

I don't deny this, I guess what I am asking to see is a little more care with how you use that power.

I know for a fact that you have the linguistic skills to do this properly. I'm not, in this post, suggesting that DD was offended or needs people to stick up for her, but as a general comment - you can certainly hurt people (real damage) with your words. I know because I can do that too by accident sometimes without realizing and when nice people who are looking out for me, tell me later what I did, I feel awful about it. We learn.

I am certainly not questioning your motive or loyalty or what drives your need to speak out, all of which I have found to be well placed over these past months. I am questioning this unsubtle and harsh aspect of your method! Please, think if it is really necessary to kick someone in the teeth just to make a philosophical point.

Fuck it. I am sounding like an old fart now, and I don't want to.

I said what I wanted to say.

I am sorry to be the pot calling the kettle black.

A..

To harsh you think? Maybe that comment about doing their job was awfully startling of a statement. But it can also be seen as sacred. From the perspective that "their job" is not necessarily something that is unenlightened or unintelligent. It's very much divine. And so a divine question. But in a black sun kind of way. It doesn't have to be an offense. Things don't have to be offensive or a kick in the teeth. It can be a compliment. My intention is pure. It wasn't meant as a put down ever. But it is a demonstration of how subconsciously we can be doing things not known. Again the high priest.

You question my method that is fine. Question it. Go against it. Experiment with it. Test it. Overcome it. Whatever makes you comfortable again. In the end it's not up to you what I decide. But you can respond however you want. I can save you the hassle and say trust me. But if you don't believe in me then learn the hard way on your own. You will come to the same conclusions in the end.

What has happened to DD only has verified what I said about this though. It is the fear that is the enemy. Fear of getting hurt. Fear of being offended. Fear of words. Fear of what is wrong. Fear of sin. Fear of being microchiped. Fear of defeat. Fear of this and fear of that.